Judge Rejects U.S. Effort to Hold Palestinian Man After Prison Term


This article was produced in partnership with the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.

WASHINGTON — A federal judge in Rochester, N.Y., on Monday rejected a Trump administration effort to use the Patriot Act to indefinitely detain a stateless Palestinian man after he completed a 15-year prison sentence for sending support to Islamic militants in the 1990s.

United States District Judge Elizabeth A. Wolford gave the Immigration and Customs Enforcement service until Thursday to free the man, Adham A. Hassoun, 58, from the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility in Batavia, N.Y. She ordered six months of supervised release at the home of his sister, with an ankle monitor and other restrictions, including not associating with known terrorists or extremists.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which took part in the court challenge to Mr. Hassoun’s continued imprisonment, declared the decision a rebuff of a claim of executive authority gained after the Sept. 11 attacks. The government sought to invoke a never-before-used administrative provision of the Patriot Act to declare Mr. Hassoun a “danger to national security” and hold him indefinitely in a migrant detention center upon completion of his prison sentence.

In her 43-page decision, Judge Wolford said the government failed to prove that Mr. Hassoun would be a danger in the future.

But as the case was headed to trial, the informant’s accounts were discredited and Justice Department lawyers withdrew them. That left the judge with no evidence on the question of whether he posed a danger.

In ordering Mr. Hassoun’s release, Judge Wolford rejected the authority of the government to detain him indefinitely “based on the executive branch’s say-so.” The judge said the case demonstrated that the government’s position “cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny.”

Mr. Hassoun’s lawyer, Jonathan Hafetz, a senior staff attorney at the A.C.L.U., said the case illustrated the potential dangers of the Patriot Act.

Mr. Hassoun, a former computer programmer, was swept up in federal raids after the Sept. 11 attacks as the F.B.I. and immigration authorities looked for Muslims with sympathies for jihadist causes. He had sent support to Muslims militants embroiled in conflicts in places like Bosnia, Kosovo and Chechnya.

“If there hadn’t been a judge and a fair process, he would have been kept in prison for the rest of his life based on lies,” Mr. Hafetz said. “In America, we don’t punish people twice for the same crime. That’s what the government tried to do.”

In the short term, Mr. Hassoun will join his sister in Florida, where he has other family, Mr. Hafetz said. It will be up to the Justice Department to decide whether and how to appeal the decision, with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit being one possible venue.

Courts have upheld presidential authority to indefinitely detain suspected Qaeda and Taliban members or associates captured abroad as war prisoners at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, but there are two key distinctions in the case of Mr. Hassoun.

First, he was arrested in the United States, and tried, convicted and served his sentence before the administration sought to hold him indefinitely in a U.S. detention center.

Also, Guantánamo prisoners are entitled to challenge the basis of their administrative detention in federal court through habeas corpus. The Trump administration argued the authority to hold Mr. Hassoun indefinitely was strictly a regulatory one.



Source link

Similar Articles

Comments

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Facebook ad boycott organizers keep the pressure on ahead of Mark Zuckerberg meeting

Our mission to help you navigate the new normal is fueled by subscribers. To enjoy unlimited access to our journalism, subscribe today. A breakthrough in...

Colts counting on second-rounders to boost second-rate offense

INDIANAPOLIS -- The Indianapolis Colts made it no secret about their intentions before the draft: Become more explosive on offense.The Colts didn't have...